Modeling and evaluating the relationship between the radius superelevation and comfort speed in horizontal curves
S. Bassan
Pages: 23-42
Abstract:
The paper presents a methodology for correlating the radius of horizontal curve (R) and the superelevation rate (e) when the radius is above the minimum and the superelevation is below its maximum (emin < e < emax). The proposed method, implements the radial utilization friction factor (fR) concept. The relationship between e and R was established by assuming linear or parabolic relationship between the superelevation rate and the radial friction coefficient and generating e-fR distribution factors (γL, γP) correspondingly. The proposed models are sensitive to the superelevation policy by applying the desired maximum superelevation rate that is appropriate with the design speed. The models were further evaluated by examining their impact on the comfort speed. The linear model generates stable or slight increase in the comfort speed as the horizontal curve radius increases and therefore maintains unconstrained (comfort) driving and reduces the potential of negative friction lateral acceleration. The results were compared to the e-R relationships recommended by the United States policy on geometric design of highways (AASHTO): method 5 (for high speed facilities) and method 1. Both models generated intermediate radii results between AASHTO's method 5 and method 1. The highest difference between AASHTO method 5 and the proposed models and between AASHTO method 1 and the linear model occurs when the radius reaches its maximum value for a minimum superelevation (emin = 2%). The linear model resulted in lower radii design values than the parabolic model and is therefore superior in terms of topography harmonization and right of way in addition to its preferable comfort speed pattern. The linear e-fR distribution model was further adjusted to the superelevation range: 0 to - emin (normal crown, NC) by controlling the radial utilization factor and maintaining the horizontal curve radii design values in a similar level. A graphical presentation and additional design radii values for e = 0 and for normal crown (NC) were supplemented.
Keywords: horizontal radius; superelevation; side friction; distribution coefficient; comfort speed
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES