A simulator examination of bicycle lane width
S. O’Hern, J. Oxley, M. Stevenson
Pages: 137-148
Abstract:
In Australia, the proportion of serious and fatal road traffic injuries involving cyclists is increasing and it is recognised that there is a growing need to improve cyclist safety to encourage increased participation in this sustainable mode of transport. Relatively little research has been conducted in Australia to understand how cyclist behaviour can be influenced through variations in road design aimed to improve safety. This paper presents the findings from a study using a newly developed virtual reality bicycle simulator. The study examined how bicycle lane width and perceptual countermeasures can influence cyclist speed and position. Twenty seven participants ranging in age 18 to 39 years (M=24.2, SD=5.7) participated in the study. A statistically significant main effect was observed for the influence of bicycle lane width on cyclist lateral position. Post-hoc testing found that cyclist position was significantly different between each lane width iteration indicating that cyclist lateral position within the bicycle lane is influenced by the available width of the bicycle lane. Statistically significant differences were also identified between participant’s position and variation in lateral position across five different perceptual countermeasure configurations. The findings of this study provide fundamental information about how cyclists choose to position themselves when riding in bicycle lanes in a validated virtual reality environment. The findings illustrate that, regardless of the width of the bicycle lane, cyclists tend to ride towards the centre of the lane and the study illustrated that use of perceptual countermeasures can be an effective measure to encourage cyclists to adopt safer cycling positions. The implications of these findings for enhanced road design to improve cyclist safety are discussed.
Keywords: bicycle simulator; bicycle lane design; perceptual countermeasures
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES