Travel time reliability value and thresholds in North Carolina
S.S. Pulugurtha, P. Penmetsa, V.R. Duddu
Pages: 103-114
Abstract:
The focus of this paper is to identify thresholds and monetize travel time reliability to evaluate transportation projects/alternatives. Stated preference survey was designed to capture perceptions of North Carolina motorists. A random survey was carried out across the cities and towns in North Carolina, and 334 valid responses were gathered from the participants. The results indicate that 60.8% of the random survey participants were willing to take an unreliable route with travel time varying from 20 to 30 minutes, whereas the remaining 39.2% of the random survey participants prefer a reliable 25-minute route. As the variation in travel time increased on the unreliable route, random survey participants preferred to opt for a reliable route over an unreliable route. Four days of unreliability per month was acceptable for only 33.8% of the random survey participants. They shifted from an unreliable route to a reliable route with an increase in the number of unreliable days in a month. Overall, the generalized value of buffer time from the random survey is estimated equal to $0.45 per minute. Differences in the value of buffer time were observed between cities, towns, and other areas across North Carolina. While a higher percentage of focus group survey participants preferred the reliable route, the value of buffer time based on data collected through focus group survey is also comparable to the random survey-based value.
Keywords: monetary value; threshold; travel time; buffer time; reliability; transportation
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES