A study of pedestrian crossing speed setting at signalized intersections considering the elderly people’ ratio in China
H. Zhang, R. Wang, J. Gao
Pages: 219-234
Abstract:
The crossing design speed at the signalized intersection should be decreased with the elderly pedestrian ratio increased. The crossing speed data of 3896 pedestrians at 6 crosswalks of 4 signalized intersections under different level of service in Chongqing, China, were used; by fitting pedestrian flow and speed at different pedestrian levels of service, it was found that pedestrian crossing speed was influenced by pedestrian traffic flow from level of service of D to F. Using the surveyed cumulative speed curves of different types of pedestrians as input, pedestrian crossing simulation scenarios at level A, B and C were constructed, respectively; then, the 15th percentile of pedestrian crossing speed was extracted with the crossing proportion of elderly people increasing from 0 to 100% in a step of 5%, respectively; the weight of pedestrian level of service and the proportion of elderly people were determined using criteria importance though inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) weight assignment method; thus, the weight of pedestrian crossing speed at level A, B and C were obtained. The pedestrian speed at different levels of service was fitted using the weights, and the obtained curves were nonlinear; the fitting curves were processed using the unknown inflection point regression model. The design pedestrian crossing speed was recommended as follows: 1.16 m/s at a level of service from level A to C and the proportion of elderly people < 22%; 0.99 m/s at the proportion of elderly people lying between 22%-45%; 0.89 m/s at the proportion of elderly people over 45%.
Keywords: pedestrian crossing speed setting; street crossing of elderly people; signalized intersection; CRITIC weight assignment method; unknown inflection point model
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES