Approach saturation headways at all-way stop control intersections: empirical investigation
A. Al-Kaisy, D. Doruk
Pages: 117-132
Abstract:
This paper presents an empirical investigation into approach saturation headways at All-Way Stop-Controlled (AWSC) intersections. The mean approach saturation headway is a surrogate measure for approach capacity, which is largely a function of traffic demand on other intersection approaches. Video data was collected over four days at an AWSC intersection site in Bozeman, Montana. The site is characterized by single-lane approaches and a high level of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Using strict protocols, video records were processed at the individual vehicle level and several information metrics were extracted for each vehicle in the data set on all approaches. Study results indicate that the mean approach saturation headways varied in a wide range due to variations in pedestrian activity, level of conflict, and the intended movement of the subject vehicle. The results suggest that, when no pedestrians were present, the maximum approach capacity in the absence of vehicular conflicts was in the order of 570 vph versus only 360 vph when conflicts were present on all other approaches. Statistical tests confirmed that the three study variables: pedestrian crossing activity, level of conflict, and subject vehicle movement all had significant effects on approach saturation headways. The pedestrian crossing activity was found to have the most significant impact on saturation headways, followed by the level of conflict and the subject vehicle movement, respectively. The results presented in this paper offer valuable information on approach saturation headways and capacity, a major input to operational analyses for this important type of intersection.
Keywords: all-way stop control; approach capacity; saturation headway; pedestrians; conflicts
2025 ISSUES
2024 ISSUES
LXII - April 2024LXIII - July 2024LXIV - November 2024Special 2024 Vol1Special 2024 Vol2Special 2024 Vol3Special 2024 Vol4
2023 ISSUES
LIX - April 2023LX - July 2023LXI - November 2023Special Issue 2023 Vol1Special Issue 2023 Vol2Special Issue 2023 Vol3
2022 ISSUES
LVI - April 2022LVII - July 2022LVIII - November 2022Special Issue 2022 Vol1Special Issue 2022 Vol2Special Issue 2022 Vol3Special Issue 2022 Vol4
2021 ISSUES
LIII - April 2021LIV - July 2021LV - November 2021Special Issue 2021 Vol1Special Issue 2021 Vol2Special Issue 2021 Vol3
2020 ISSUES
2019 ISSUES
Special Issue 2019 Vol1Special Issue 2019 Vol2Special Issue 2019 Vol3XLIX - November 2019XLVII - April 2019XLVIII - July 2019
2018 ISSUES
Special Issue 2018 Vol1Special Issue 2018 Vol2Special Issue 2018 Vol3XLIV - April 2018XLV - July 2018XLVI - November 2018
2017 ISSUES
Special Issue 2017 Vol1Special Issue 2017 Vol2Special Issue 2017 Vol3XLI - April 2017XLII - July 2017XLIII - November 2017
2016 ISSUES
Special Issue 2016 Vol1Special Issue 2016 Vol2Special Issue 2016 Vol3XL - November 2016XXXIX - July 2016XXXVIII - April 2016
2015 ISSUES
Special Issue 2015 Vol1Special Issue 2015 Vol2XXXV - April 2015XXXVI - July 2015XXXVII - November 2015
2014 ISSUES
Special Issue 2014 Vol1Special Issue 2014 Vol2Special Issue 2014 Vol3XXXII - April 2014XXXIII - July 2014XXXIV - November 2014
2013 ISSUES
2012 ISSUES
2011 ISSUES
2010 ISSUES
2009 ISSUES
2008 ISSUES
2007 ISSUES
2006 ISSUES
2005 ISSUES
2004 ISSUES
2003 ISSUES